Definitions |
A. Treatment outcome visceral leishmaniasis (VL)
B. Treatment outcome cutaneous & mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (CL & MCL)
C. SbV sensitivity Leishmania isolates
Protocol:
The SbV sensitivity of all isolates was tested in vitro within
seven passages after isolation using the following protocol:
Reference strains:
Definition in vitro SbV sensitivity
of a Leishmania isolate:
Activity Index (A.I.) = EC50 tested isolate / EC50 reference strain
Isolated Strains
& Patient Samples |
A. Nepal
| Pathology |
Isolates (reference cryobank ITMA) |
Samples (all patients) |
| 103 isolates from confirmed VL patients |
||
| (including 21 isolates from unresponsive |
1) Bone marrow for PCR |
|
| Current status characterisation: |
||
| - 43 isolates species typed: all L. donovani |
2) Serum samples |
|
| - 27 isolates in vitro SbV sensitivity tested |
||
| PKDL: |
4 isolates |
skin biopsies & serum samples |
| Table: Summary of isolated strains & patient samples collected at BPKHIS, Nepal. |
||
B. Peru/Bolivia
| Pathology |
Isolates (reference cryobank ITMA) |
Samples |
| 302 isolates from confirmed CL patients |
||
| (including 51 isolates from unresponsive or relapse patients) |
1) 272 skin biopsies for PCR |
|
| Current status characterisation: |
||
| - 99 isolates species typed: |
2) 219 skin biopsies for immunology |
|
| - 39 isolates in vitro SbV sensitivity tested |
||
| MCL: |
81 isolates from confirmed MCL patients |
1) 61 biopsies for PCR |
| Current status characterisation: |
||
| 3 isolates species typed: all L. braziliensis |
2) 37 biopsies for immunology |
|
| 4 isolates in vitro SbV sensitivity tested |
||
| Table: Summary of isolated strains & patient samples collected at IMTavH, Peru and CUMETROP, Bolivia |
||
Treatment Outcome |
A. Visceral Leishmaniasis (Nepal)
Recruitment & Treatment (January
2002 to September 2003)
If VL was confirmed by parasitological examination of bone marrow or
spleen, a 30 day SbV treatment was started as follows:
Follow-up (FU) of treated patients at end of treatment and 3, 6 & 12 months after treatment with:
Treatment outcome of all treated patients is given in the table below:
| 301 suspect cases |
||
| 224 definite VL |
67 non VL |
|
| 198 SSG treated |
24 treated with amphotericin B |
|
| 181 > or 25 days SSG treated |
17 < 25 days SSG treated |
|
| 169 completed 12 months FU |
12 patients lost to FU |
|
| 153 definite cure |
16 treatment failure 9.5% |
|
B. Cutaneous and Mucocutaneous Leishmaniasis (Peru)
Recruitment & Treatment (November 2001 to August 2004)
Follow up (FU) of treated patients at 1,3,6 & 12 months after treatment with parasitological evaluation if suspicion of treatment failure.
Treatment outcome of SbV treated patients with 12 month FU complete is presented in the table below:
| CL |
MCL |
||
| 113 responders 71.4% |
45 non-responders 25.5% |
17 responders 73.9% |
6 non-responders 26.1% |
| No statistical difference between 2 clinical presentations. |
|||
Risk Factors
for Treatment Failure |
As factors on the level of treatment and host can potentially cause SbV failure, an analysis was performed using the clinical and epidimiological data collected for all patients, to identify clinical risk factors for SbV treatment failure.
A. Visceral Leishmaniasis (Nepal)
Using univariate analysis, it was demonstrated that treatment failure is not associated (P-value > or = 0.05) with sex, age, nutritional status, spleen size or other clinical parameters, hemoglobin count, presence of concomitant disease or batch of SSG. The following factors were identified as risk factors for VL treatment failure:
Ambulatory treatment (OR=10.87, 95% CI (1.26, 93.37), P-value=0.0297)
Fever > 12 weeks (OR=9.63, 95% CI (2.45, 37.84), P-value=0.0012)
Origin Western districts (OR=6.91, 95% CI (1.61, 29.72), P-value=0.0094)
B. Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (Peru)
Using univariate analysis, it was shown that CL treatment failure is not associated (P-value > or = 0.05) with nutritional status of the patient, location, size and number of skin lesion(s), total dose of antimonials administered and the status of the lesion at the end of treatment. The following factors were identified as risk factors for CL treatment failure:
Younger age (< 16 years) (OR=3.75, 95%CI = (1.51,9.38), P-value=0.001) and shorter stay (< 12 months) in transmission area (OR=2.64, 95% CI (0.97, 8.37), P-value=0.04)
Duration of disease < 3 months (OR=3.14, 95% CI (1.18, 8.67), P-value=0.01)
1 or more nodule(s) (OR=7.78, 95% CI (0.89, 64.52), P-value = 0.064) or multiple lesions of various types (OR=78.86, 95% CI (8.6, 723.19), P-value= < 0.001)
SbV Sensitivity
of Leishmania Isolates |
All in vitro SbV sensitivity tests were performed in an amastigote-macrophage model, as described above. The results for isolates from VL patients and CL patients are given below.
A. VL isolates, Nepal
In vitro SbV sensitivity was so far tested for 27 isolates, all characterised as L. donovani, including 20 isolates from patients with definite cure and 7 isolates from patients with treatment failure. The results are listed in the table below:
| Definite
Cure |
Treatment
Failure |
|
| 0 |
3 |
0 |
| 1 |
3 |
2 |
| 2 |
2 |
0 |
| 3 |
2 |
0 |
| 4 |
0 |
0 |
| 5 |
0 |
0 |
| 6 |
10 |
5 |
| P-value=0.5339 Table: In vitro SbV sensitivity of isolates vs. treatment outcome |
||
We conclude:
1) Natural SbV resistant L. donovani isolates
are present in Nepal
2) There is no association between clinical outcome and the
parasite’s in vitro SbV sensitivity. Factors
not present in the in vitro model could affect treatment outcome
e.g. immunological factors, drug pharmacokinetics, parasite adaptation
in vivo.
Treatment failure is not a synonym for drug resistance.
B. CL isolates, Peru
Among the isolates for CL, several species were encountered (see above). SbV resistant isolates were found within the species L. braziliensis, L. guyanensis, L. peruviana and L. lainsoni. However, there seems to be a significant association between in vitro SbV sensitivity and the specific Leishmania species (see table below), with L. guyanensis (median activity of 2) as the most sensitive species in vitro.
| Species |
No. |
Median A.I. (range A.I.) |
L. braziliensis |
26 |
6 (1-6) |
L. guyanensis |
5 |
2 (0-5) |
L. peruviana |
1 |
5 (5) |
L. lainsoni |
4 |
5 (5) |
| P-value=0.039 Table: Species vs in vitro SbV sensitivity |
||
For patients with a defined outcome (12 months FU complete), there is a significant association between treatment outcome and parasite species (see table below). Patients infected with L. guyanensis had a 94% likelihood of responding to treatment whereas for patients infected with L. braziliensis or L. peruviana this was reduced to 60%. This supports the association between species and in vitro sensitivity; L. guyanensis is more sensitive to pentavalent antimony than L. braziliensis and L. peruviana.
Species |
Definite Cure |
Treatment Failure |
L. braziliensis |
11 (58%) |
8 (42%) |
L. guyanensis |
17 (94%) |
8 (6%) |
L. peruviana |
6 (60%) |
4 (40%) |
L. lainsoni |
4 (100%) |
0 (0%) |
| P-value=0.029 Table: Species vs. treatment outcome (12 months FU) |
||
Treatment failure is not a synonym for drug resistance.
SbV Resistance
Markers & Mechanism |
Comparative studies on transcriptomic level of SbV resistant and SbV sensitive isolates (as shown by in vitro SbV sensitivity testing) has resulted so far in the identification of 4 putative molecular markers, summarised in the table below:
Marker |
Features |
Species * |
Hypothetical |
DPF |
= Differential
Polyadenylation Factor |
L.
braziliensis |
Unknown |
GCS |
= gene coding for enzyme gamma–glutamylcysteine synthetase, catalyses the rate limiting step in the synthesis of glutathione (thiol moiety of trypanothione). GCS is lower expressed in SbV resistant compared to SbV sensitive isolates. |
L. donovani |
decrease thiol biosynthesis, |
ODC |
= gene coding for enzyme ornithine decarboxylase, catalyses the rate limiting step in the synthesis of the spermidine moiety of trypanothione. ODC is lower expressed in SbV resistant compared to SbV sensitive isolates. |
L. donovani |
decrease thiol biosynthesis, |
AQP1 |
= gene coding for the protein aquaglyceroporin 1; catalyses the uptake of SbIII (the active form of SbV). AQP1 is lower expressed in SbV resistant compared to SbV sensitive isolates. |
L. donovani |
decrease uptake of active form SbIII (resulting from activation in macrophage) |
* = Species tested so far: for L. braziliensis = 2 isolates (1 SbV sensitive, 1 SbV resistant); for L. donovani = 4 isolates (2 SbV sensitive, 2 SbV resistant). |
|||
| Conclusion: Based on the markers GCS, ODC & AQP1, we hypothesise that the mechanism of natural SbV resistance is multifactorial involving (i) a changed thiol metabolism leading to inhibition of the activation of SbV inside the amastigote and (ii) a decreased uptake of SbIII resulting from SbV activation in the macrophage. (compare to SbIII resistance model) |
|
Immunology |
Basic immunological parameters were determined and compared in patients with definite cure and patients with treatment failure as to verify the role of the host immune response in treatment outcome. Based on the mouse model for VL, the following hypothesis was formulated for association between cytokine profile and clinical outcome:
| Cytokine |
Th1-profile |
Th2-profile |
| IFN-gamma |
+ + |
- |
| IL-10 |
- |
+ + |
| IL-4 |
- |
+ |
| TNF-alpha |
+ |
- |
| Resistance to infection |
Susceptibility to
infection |
A. VL patients, Nepal
Serum samples from 61 patients taken before treatment (Day 0) were used to determine the cytokines IFN-gamma, IL-10, IL-4 and TNF-alpha using ELISA at HUG. The obtained cytokine profiles were compared for the following groups:
| 1) |
Patients with |
vs |
Patients with |
|
|
|||
| |
|||
| 2) |
Patients with |
vs |
Patients with failure |
|
|
|||
We conclude that:
B. CL patients, Peru
Skin biopsies taken before treatment (Day 0) and during treatment (Day 10) from 48 patients were used to determine the cytokines IFN-gamma, IL-4, IL-10, IL-13 and TNF-alpha using real-time quantitative PCR at HUG. The obtained cytokine profiles were compared before treatment and during treatment for the following 2 groups:
| 1) |
Before treatment (D0): |
Patients with |
vs |
Patients with |
|
|
||||
| |
||||
| 2) |
Changes during |
Patients with |
vs |
Patients with |
|
|
||||
We conclude that:
Population
Genetics |
A. Nepal
Fingerprinting allows evaluation of the dynamics of the spreading of drug resistance in natural Leishmania populations. A population genetics study was done on Nepalese L. donovani isolates using kDNA/PCR-RFLP, which is currently the most discriminatory fingerprinting method. 25 isolates were analyzed, including isolates sampled from the same patients before and after treatment failure (interconnected isolates on tree) : (i) 1 month follow up (pairs BPK173/0 & BPK173/1; BPK275/0 & BPK275/1, (ii) 1 year follow up (pair BPK181/0 & BPK181/12).
| |
Phenetic analysis: |
We conclude that:
B. Peru
No results available
Guidelines |
Based on the results and conclusions within this project, the following guidelines were formulated and could contribute to policies to overcome drug resistance:
1) Rapid & improved diagnosis:
2) Individual patient managment:
The identification of clinical risk factors of treatment failure is useful for individual patient’s management. For patients at higher risk of Sbv failure:
3) Access to full treatment for ALL:
4) Drug policy & CONTROL including:
5) Promotion of the evaluation of combination therapy.
Combination therapy using the currently available drugs would minimise the risk for emergence of resistance against individual drugs.
| © 2005 LeishNatDrug Consortium | Last updated: 07/08/2005 |